Unbelievable Stupidity - Michael Richardson MP
In conjunction with the NSW Coastal Rights Association Inc, and Jack Tait, the president, who proffered a concern of suggestion that Toxic Waist had been dumped of Gabo Island and may be effecting the marine life, I suggested that SOS-NEWS had access to documented evidence of massive dumping from the late 1940's to the early 1970's by military conveyance of RAAF aircraft and NAVY ships and barges.
A thirty second search on the internet by a primary school student could establish that the GOVERNMENT dumped toxic waist around the coastline of Australia.
It would seem the letter of concern sent to the NSW Opposition Leader, Peter Debnam by Jack Tait of his concern, was passed down the chain of command with election candidate and shadow Minister for, the Environment, Michael Richardson
Required to answer.
The letter to Jack Tait received from the Shadow Minister below give great credence to what seems an Army of independents who are forming a group to represent the people and LISTEN not SPIN as the content would indicate the man is a fool, and with the thought of being crowned Environment Minister - a bloody National Disaster.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
8 December 2006
Mr Jack Tait,
President,
Coastal Rights Association Inc,
PO Box 572
BATEMANS BAY NSW 2536
Dear Mr Tait,
Thank-you for writing to the Leader of The Opposition, Peter Debnam, regarding the issue of alleged toxic waist dumping at sea. Mr Debnam has asked me to reply on his behalf
The NSW Opposition takes very seriously the pollution of our waterways. It was our persistent intervention that forced the Labor Government to do something about the dioxin contamination in Homebush Bay, and we intend to extend the clean-up, if necessary, in Government make Sydney Harbour safe for fishing again.
However, so far as the matter you have raised is concerned, I simply don't have sufficient information on which to make a decision as to an appropriate course of action. You yourself say your research is "limited". I don't know what minerals are alleged to have been dumped at sea, where they have been dumped (inside or outside the three-mile limit) and what the implications for the marine environment are.
Given the lack of detailed information, I'm afraid I can't take this matter any further.
Yours sincerely
(signature)
Michael Richardson MP
Shadow Minister for The Environment
A thirty second search on the internet by a primary school student could establish that the GOVERNMENT dumped toxic waist around the coastline of Australia.
It would seem the letter of concern sent to the NSW Opposition Leader, Peter Debnam by Jack Tait of his concern, was passed down the chain of command with election candidate and shadow Minister for, the Environment, Michael Richardson
Required to answer.
The letter to Jack Tait received from the Shadow Minister below give great credence to what seems an Army of independents who are forming a group to represent the people and LISTEN not SPIN as the content would indicate the man is a fool, and with the thought of being crowned Environment Minister - a bloody National Disaster.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
8 December 2006
Mr Jack Tait,
President,
Coastal Rights Association Inc,
PO Box 572
BATEMANS BAY NSW 2536
Dear Mr Tait,
Thank-you for writing to the Leader of The Opposition, Peter Debnam, regarding the issue of alleged toxic waist dumping at sea. Mr Debnam has asked me to reply on his behalf
The NSW Opposition takes very seriously the pollution of our waterways. It was our persistent intervention that forced the Labor Government to do something about the dioxin contamination in Homebush Bay, and we intend to extend the clean-up, if necessary, in Government make Sydney Harbour safe for fishing again.
However, so far as the matter you have raised is concerned, I simply don't have sufficient information on which to make a decision as to an appropriate course of action. You yourself say your research is "limited". I don't know what minerals are alleged to have been dumped at sea, where they have been dumped (inside or outside the three-mile limit) and what the implications for the marine environment are.
Given the lack of detailed information, I'm afraid I can't take this matter any further.
Yours sincerely
(signature)
Michael Richardson MP
Shadow Minister for The Environment
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home