|
One thing
I have had time to get my head around lately is a paper put out by the
Victorian DSE as a discussion paper to illicit submissions on a range of
issues they tell us they need to address over the next year, to formulate
policy regarding the landcare and biodiversity issues we will be facing
over the next couple of decades.
A really nice piece of political spin as they keep plugging the public
participation aspect yet, as with other submission requests, there has been
no real public media program.
When you think of this it is quite laughable.
We are overloaded with political media at great expense to the tax payer at
election time, to convince us we should vote for the same liars again on
the premise the elected government could only remain there for 1 term.
This submission process will decide how Victorian people will be allowed to
spend their leisure time and what type of restrictive society we will live
in over the next few decades. Which one should we be spending millions of
dollars of advertising money on?????
Should you agree with my perceptions could you publish the fact that this
is happening and the web site to download information about this discussion
paper. www.dse.vic.gov.au/landwhitepaper
The following is from a US source and replacing the US/America text
mentions with Australia, the vast majority of this is applicable to this
country and our society. Maybe it would wake some more people up to our
desperate situation if they see it is also happening to another country,
particularly the USA.
The many paragraphs are particularly relevant to issues in the Victorian
DSE discussion paper.
John Sloan
SAVE THE PLANET - KILL
YOURSELF?
By Darren Weeks
May
19, 2007
We are told that
over-population is the greatest threat facing planet earth. Daily, we are
given lectures of how we humans are screwing up the environment, damaging
the earth’s “fragile” eco-system, killing the birds, and polluting the air
and water. Forked-tongued politicians, finger-wagging bureaucrats, and a
choir of “green” organizations moan an off-key chorus of alarm about the
human “footprint” on earth.
We are blamed for
over-fishing the seas, deforestation of wooded areas, droughts and desertification,
wildfires and floods. We cause congestion in the cities, sprawl in the
suburbs, and terrorize the creatures in the countryside. It is obvious from
what we’re told, Americans have no place in the world and the world is
better off without us.
We drive too much, eat
too much, breathe too much and throw away too much. We are living too
large, we take up too much space, we are too rich, we’ve become too fat,
and we have too many children.
Every day, and in
every way, we are evil. We kill, we destroy, we pollute, and we intrude. We
are the scourge of “Mother Earth”, and the warts on Gaia’s backside.
This is the message
that is being declared from the halls of government, academia, tax-exempt
foundations, and the Establishment-controlled media. Never before has it
ever been clearer that not only are we unfit stewards of the land and its
natural resources, we literally are not worthy to breathe the air.
As a matter of fact,
with the recent Supreme Court decision that declared carbon dioxide a
“pollutant” that must be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency,
we are officially damaging the planet by doing nothing else than breathing.
At the same time the
venom of elite-driven hatred spews forth from every channel of propaganda,
we have bacteria
being added to our lunch meat and fluoride added to our water supply.
We have foreign substances being sprayed in our skies, and genetically-modified
crops producing their own pesticides for our consumption. Our vitamins and
nutritional supplements are being eliminated in favour of a limitless
bombardment of toxin-infested vaccines and mandated pharmaceutical drugs.
[Read the book "Fluoride
Deception"]
Our farmers and
ranchers have been molested for years by endless regulations, land-use and
irrigation restrictions, and have, for decades, been paid not to produce.
As domestic food production has dropped, foreign food imports have risen,
along with sicknesses, food poisonings and contaminations.
It is high time that
every American begins to make the connection between the deionisation of
all normal human activity, versus the daily and ongoing attacks on our
food, our water, our vitamins, on all of the basic staples that we need to
sustain our lives.
Upon careful
examination of the evidence, it is difficult to escape the reality that we
are gradually and deliberately being made victims of a mass genocide. The
necessary pieces are being placed together to eliminate a large number of
the population.
In an April 16th
Associated Press article headlined, Imported
Food Rarely Inspected, it said,
“Just 1.3 percent of imported fish, vegetables,
fruit and other foods are inspected — yet those government inspections
regularly reveal food unfit for human consumption.”
On April 23rd, the
Associated Press ran a follow-up article headlined, U.S.
Food Safety Strained by Imports. The article said,
“The same food safety net that couldn't catch
poisoned pet food ingredients from China has a much bigger hole.
“Billions of dollars’ worth of foreign
ingredients that Americans eat in everything from salad dressing to ice
cream get a pass from overwhelmed inspectors, despite a rising tide of imports
from countries with spotty records, according to an Associated Press
analysis of federal trade and food data.
“When U.S. Food and Drug Administration
inspectors at ports and border checkpoints look, they find shipments that
are filthy or otherwise contaminated. They rarely bother, however, in part
because ingredients aren't a priority.”
How does that make you
feel America? Your very own mainstream news media is telling you that you
are eating trash! Your government is aware of the problem. In fact, they
created the problem by persecuting domestic food producers at every turn,
and forcing family farm owners out of business. In the vacuum, massive
multi-national corporations and foreign producers have stepped up
production to feed you and almost none of their products are inspected. It
isn’t a priority. Why? [See Vedeo "Future of Food"]
Could it be that the
answer lies in the fact that they keep telling us that over-population is a
problem? Could it be that the real movers and shakers behind public policy
in America consider you a liability to their environment, to their power
base, and to their world Order?
The truth is that
those who hold the reigns of power consider this planet theirs. The air you
breathe, the water you drink, the land you think you own — it’s all theirs!
That’s why you’ll pay to use it all. And make no mistake about it, taxes
upon your carbon emissions are right around the corner. They will charge
you to use the air because you’re a liability to their planet, simply
because you’re alive. They place themselves in the position of the
Almighty, and they’ve decided that you don’t belong here.
This principle is
demonstrated with unequalled clarity at the Church of Euthanasia website,
where their motto is “Save the
planet, kill yourself.” This non-profit foundation promotes what they
refer to as their “four pillars” — suicide, abortion, cannibalism, and
sodomy. Their one commandment is, “thou shalt not procreate.” Although they
say their purpose is to restore “balance between humans and the remaining
species on earth,” they glorify death, encourage suicide and have even
hosted instructions on how to commit suicide.
Though much less
diplomatic in their choice of language, the Church of Euthanasia’s ideology
is harmonious to the United Nations Environment Programme’s Agenda 21
initiatives that are being implemented all across America and around the
world. Though the UN is much more careful to disguise it’s people-hating
agenda with pretty terms such as “human rights”, “walkable communities”,
“Smart Growth”, “New Urbanism”, “Cool Cities”, “Scenic Byways”, and “conservation
easements”, the outcome is the same. The plans that are being implemented
around the country and the world are designed to crush human activity, put
the means of production off limits to you, and to stop human “sprawl” —
meaning, people living any place they decide you shouldn’t.
Americans must quickly
awaken and realize that there is a silent and undeclared war upon our
freedom, our health, and our very existence. Quietly, and behind the scenes
in secret meetings, these people haters are plotting to remove every
support needed to sustain life.
In 1972, the Rockefeller
Commission on Population and the American Future was commissioned by
President Richard Nixon. The commission, which was chaired by John D.
Rockefeller III, lamented the prospect of “one of the most serious
challenges” facing America. They outlined three “positions” that needed to
be addressed as population policy, which included greater access to
contraceptives and “fertility control,” the promotion of “equal rights” for
women and minorities — getting them busy in careers so they aren’t tempted
to have children — and finally a reshaping of American values to harmonize
them with environmental conservation. Of the last point, the commission
writes,
“The third position deals with the population
problem in an ecological framework, one whose primary axiom asserts the
functional interdependence of man and his environment. It calls for a far
more fundamental shift in the operative values of modern society. The need
for more education and knowledge and the need to eliminate poverty and
racism are important, but not enough. For the population problem, and the
growth ethic with which it is intimately connected, reflect deeper external
conditions and more fundamental political, economic, and philosophical
values. Consequently, to improve the quality of our existence while slowing
growth, will require nothing less than a basic recasting of American
values.”
It is this “recasting
of American values” that is precisely what attorney and environmental
activist Daniel Sitarz, the author of the authoritative version of Agenda
21, referred to when in 1992, at the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development, he stated:
“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a
profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has
ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and
individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial
resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental
consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and
collective decision-making at every level. There are specific actions which
are intended to be undertaken by multinational corporations and
entrepreneurs, by financial institutions and individual investors, by
high-tech companies and indigenous people, by workers and labour unions, by
farmers and consumers, by students and schools, by governments and
legislators, by scientists, by women, by children — in short, by every
person on Earth.”
To put it another way,
Sitarz is saying that there is no single person on the planet that won’t be
effected by the implementation of Agenda 21. He chooses words such as
“profound reorientation”, “major shift” and “unprecedented” to describe
their own agenda! Does this not sound a little revolutionary?
At this point, one
must ask the question, who gave these people the mandate to reshape society
and “recast” our values toward the principles of “sustainability” and
Agenda 21? What right do they have to tell us how and where to live, how
much water to use, what we can and cannot eat, and what to do with our own
property?
The answer is, of
course, we did. We’ve been so pacified with TV, movies, celebrity worship,
video games, gossip magazines, and a million other things that accomplish
nothing, that we have not fulfilled our duties to govern our country. Now,
we don’t like the results of leaving the process of government to the
professionals. The truth of the matter is that we are living the
consequences of our own acquiescence. We are reaping what we’ve sewn, and
we are now being targeted for extermination.
Quoting again from the
Rockefeller Commission,
“Population growth is one of the major factors
affecting the demand for resources and the deterioration of the environment
in the United States. The further we look into the future, the more
important population becomes. From an environmental and resource point of
view, there are no advantages from further growth of population beyond the
level to which our past rapid growth has already committed us. Indeed, we
would be considerably better off over the next 30 to 50 years if there were
a prompt reduction in our population growth rate. This is especially true
with regard to problems of water, agricultural land, and outdoor
recreation. While the nation can, if it has to, find ways to solve the
problems growth creates, we will not like some of the solutions we will
have to adopt.”
To what potential
solutions could Rockefeller and his cohorts on the commission have been
referring? Could it have been the massive depopulation efforts that we are
currently experiencing in the 21st century? Could they have been eluding to
the poisoning of our air, water, and food supply? Could it have been the
limitless wars, and orchestrated acts of terrorism? Perhaps, it was
pre-born infanticide that they were referencing, as we’ve murdered over a
million unborn children a year since the Supreme Court made its ruling on
abortion the year after Rockefeller’s report on population was issued.
Chapter 5 of United
Nations’ Agenda 21 says it this way,
“The growth of world population and production
combined with unsustainable consumption patterns places increasingly severe
stress on the life-supporting capacities of our planet. These interactive
processes affect the use of land, water, air, energy and other resources.
Rapidly growing cities, unless well-managed, face major environmental
problems. The increase in both the number and size of cities calls for
greater attention to issues of local government and municipal management.
The human dimensions are key elements to consider in this intricate set of
relationships and they should be adequately taken into consideration in
comprehensive policies for sustainable development. … Population policy
should also recognize the role played by human beings in environmental and
development concerns. There is a need to increase awareness of this issue
among decision makers at all levels and to provide both better information
on which to base national and international policies and a framework
against which to interpret this information.”
What are the specific
details of the “population policies” inherent in Agenda 21? How is it that
America was never told about this program to organize and/or eliminate life
on planet earth?
The truth is that
we’re not supposed to know because if the great unwashed were made aware of
the plans to control every aspect of their lives, and to kill off a major
portion of their numbers, they might find it somewhat objectionable.
The radical
environmentalists, once on the fringe of extremist groups, have now been institutionalised
into every area of governance, academia, and law, from the United Nations
on down. And you and your children are targeted for mass extinction.
To those who care, you
are implored to educate yourself and then become involved in the fight to
stop this agenda, at a local level where the plans are being implemented.
And to those radical
environmentalists who truly believe the planet would be better served if
there were less humans living here, you should lead by example. The rest of
us might find, after you’re gone, that you were right.
© 2007 Darren Weeks - All Rights
Reserved
Darren Weeks is a
life-long activist and researcher. A graduate of the Specs Howard School of
Broadcast Arts in Michigan, he has been a professional radio and television
broadcaster since 1991 and has used his influence to expose corruption in
local government. It was through his career that he discovered the
alternative media and awakened to the serious issues facing America.
In addition to his
role as husband and father, Weeks hosts the Govern America radio program on the
First Amendment Radio Network and is presently working on the creation of a
public database of the international players that are behind the push
toward the new one-world system.
E-Mail: darren@darrenweeks.net
Web site: www.governamerica.com
Home
|
