"Three things can not hide for long: the Moon, the Sun and the Truth" -- Siddhartha
Subscribing Computers to date -- 45,832 + Groups who email SOS-NEWS to their members presents over 350,000 + Readers Monday 23rd July 2007 - - - Editor Mal Davies
Website www.sosnews.org Email - - - - editor@sosnews.org
Printing this SOS-NEWS can be done from this Email Now published in A4 size
Just click the print icon on your Browser menu bar

My Say

The wealth we hear from the prime minister in waiting, is music to the ears of the converted.

In the real world we pay our pensioners, who built this nation, and are pre compulsory superannuation, around $450 per fortnight - $225.00 per week.

Overseas aid is in the Billions of dollars and we have diggers waiting in line to get war service pensions, doled out by bureaucrats who dictate the rules.

We have seniors sleeping in doorways because rents are beyond them.

To take office at the next election without green preference, and looking after your nest feathering, give the seniors of this nation at least the basic wage, they are cold tired and have done their bit for Australia.

Remember the forgotten people VOTE.

Mal Davies (Editor)




Dear Mal,

Your analysis of Tony Jones approach to the Great Global Warming Swindle exposes just how a seemingly neutral journalist like Tony Jones can become a blind and ignorant captive of one side of an argument. In this one program, Jones has greatly diminished his former standing and credibility. The issue of climatic change has been a many faceted issue for decades yet Jones appears to have just found out about it a few days ago.

Scientific articles available on the internet have portrayed in great detail just how utterly complex climate change can be, and how climate movement over aeons is connected with an umbilical cords of the sun, the orbits of the Earth and Moon, volcanic events and so on.

I found Martin Durkin's program very refreshing and interesting and, as you pointed out, for exposing the great global fraud of global warming. Surely the real issue is the titanic mountains of garbage we produce each second that simply piles up in rubbish tips across the world as a consequence of mass production of products, like cars, plastic bags, packaging and so on without end.

I too was gobsmacked at the astonishing way Jones approached this issue, admitting that he did a crash course in his hotel room for a couple of days and then emerging as an expert on the subject - rather than a window on the views of others.

His understanding of the issue was rather like a big-eyed undergraduate in his second or third tutorial, suddenly challenging the credentials of the Dean of the Faculty.

His rude bullying attack on Durkin reflects something ugly lying at the heart of TV journalism in Australia. I simply can't imagine a British interviewer of any standing being so bloody rude. It's a good job the ABC isn't broadcast outside Australia. What a bunch of morons we must look like.

Well done Mal once again in exposing this tin pot approach by ABC Pravda to such an important issue.

Peter Clack
Author and Journalist



Peter,

I thank you for your support, but I must say the credit for that story lies totally with Brumbyy (with2y's) - the right hand of SOS-NEWS and a person I could not do without.

He researched that program several times to glean the story he told - and more yet to come (see right side story).

Exposure of this "so called" peoples radio/TV known as the ABC, needs to be show for it's expanding tenticles as a political platform funded on the taxpayers dollars.

Try to get on a talkback radio program if your speaking against the agenda of that presenter.

A grand example is the frequency that Jill Redwood (pictured) is heard on Victorian Gippsland ABC Radio with amazing monotonous regularity, speaking as an anti logger, and resident tree hugger. But never a word as a regular loosing candidate at elections for the greens, which calculates her support from within the locals.



Here is Redwood caught on the chainsaw - does this tell us anything about this radical ratbags credability?



Redwood is allowed to ramble by presenter, and well organised bias greenie, Penny Mongo (pictured), who is a classic case in question.

Try getting a word in about anything anti-green and the form replies roll out - "we are out of time" or "it does not fit with the program".

The list goes on and on upon the ABC carousel all over the nation.




Mal Davies
Editor


NOW OPEN



Shit Creek Paddle Store will be marketing products to help SOS-NEWS maintain our directed pain in the arse of those that are in most need of such... Click here to visit the store

DR FLEMING

>

Fleming sells out National Parks to highest bidder.
Tourism for the top end of town.
Force out the farmer, bring in the developer.



TURN-BULL



Architect of the recent raid on a NSW farmer and family
saw Turnbull in full importance mode demanding prosecutions

He ripped out trees in the Solomon Island to his personal cash up of $25 Million in just 12 months ...





FELLOW MUSHROOMS...


To Fridays story on Blackberry planting in National Parks by the greens in Victoria ..............


Attack on NSW woody weeds boosted Australia


Thursday, 19 July 2007- Source NSW Farmers

Federal Agriculture Minister, Peter McGauran, has granted $1.1million in funding to tackle the woody weeds problem in the central and western areas of NSW.

Mr McGauran made the announcement at the NSW Farmers' Association annual conference in Sydney.

The association is now calling on the NSW Government to following the Federal Government's lead and match the $1.1million funding grant.

Association president, Jock Laurie, says the funding is a step in the right direction to assist farmers in the area, struggling with the issue.

"Woody weeds have been a major problem for many farmers in the area for several years and it's pleasing the Federal Government has acknowledged the issue," Mr Laurie said.

Woody weeds can overrun native grasslands and cause environmental damage to productive agricultural farmland.

Soil erosion is also a major issue when farmers are unable to control woody weeds.














Just Whom - Does The Bell Toll For


Peter Spencer - Dr John Walsh
Monaro farmer strikes another blow to force the Commonwealth Government to compensate Australian farmers for loss of carbon credits took a step forward in the federal court this week.

Peter Spencer who started this project of rights, through the Constitutional Property Rights Association then later forming and joining forces with the Commonwealth Property Protection Association, is arguing that native vegetation regulations take away farmers - land owners rights to billions of dollars in carbon credits constituting a "Regulatory Takings".

This represents a breach of sect 51 ss xxxi of the Australian Constitution " Just Terms" through them - the Commonwealth and the States deliberately including it as the main component of the "Australia Clause" of the Kyoto Protocol it represents a deliberate premeditated ACT of property theft perpetrated by the Commonwealth Government in colusion with the States from which they benefit.

This treachery has now been blatantly and publicly admitted by Costello and Carr on ABC and the admission that is was done to protect the Coal Industry in thier production of electricity and exports and to achieve Kyoto emission targets.

The 75 million tonnes of carbon saved to date, by locking up the farms allowed Australia to achieve the 108% limit set for Australia by the Protocol.

In the Federal Court of Australia on Thursday July 19 2007 the case has gone to the next level as the government legal team keep trying to strike it out, in other words requesting a dismissal of the issue as they claim the farmers assertions are frivolous.

Judge Gyles of the Federal Court, has ordered the Commonwealth to lodge its submission for Summary Judgement and the Plaintiff Peter Spencer's to lodge his application for interlocutory orders restraining the Commonwealth from issuing carbon certificates until the full proceedings are deliberated on by the Court by the 29th July2007.

The case has been set down for the next hearing on August 30 with the provision for either side to apply to the Federal Court Registrar to bring forward the proceedings at any time prior to that date with 2 days notice. Where by the taxpayer funded legal team for the Commonwealth Government takes on Peter Spencer, formally.

His legal team led by Dr John Walsh of Branagh - senior barrister, who is providing services to the CPPA group. They have quoted that all the "T's" are crossed as are the "I's" dotted and a win in these proceedings will not only be for Peter Spencer and the group but for all farmers in Australia looks like the probable outcome.

From a very recent statement Peter Spencer gave to New South Wales Farmers Association he Publicly challenged President Jock Laurie at the gathering in Tamworth concerning the Industry's prime lobby groups total failure in protecting, farmers interests.

Laurie claerly stated that farmers substantial funds - well over $80 million - should be directed to more positive issues other than that which Spencer was championing. Mr Laurie said "He could not irresponsibly use Assoc recourses perusing claims that his legal advise had made clear, was nothing more then a waste of time."

This not only confirms contact between the two, but a denial of assistance from the Farmers Association.

Spencer questioned the commonsense in failing to protect secure property rights as if this was lost - how would there be farming at all. He told Jock if that was the attitude used by Wilberforce, then slavery would still be commonplace and if women pursuing suffrage submitted to that way of thinking then women would not be voting today and that is incomprehensible.

Spencer told me, mans perpetual walk down the road to Civilised Nobility is littered with the struggle of visionaries and persons on lofty pursuits. This struggle this passion is what separates us from the animals around us

Spencer, suggests a closer look at the Australia Institute web page for proof of the deep seated and well established ideological intension to remove all individual property rights across Australia and stressed this objective had now been taken up politically.

In his statement at Tamworth, Mr Spencer said the NSW Farmers Association along with the National Farmers Federation had over the last 30 years presided over the largest surrender of property rights in 800 years since Magna Carta. This already included the loss of coal, water and vegetation and now Carbon was being attacked.

Mr Spencer asked my Mr Laurie and Mr Morgan if it was not time they considered a change of strategy was needed before farmers were left with nothing.

Look at what just 2 weeks can do - smelling the wind of a winner emanating from the Court proceedings in recent weeks in the cases Spencer's Team is now running.

Jock Laurie now told the ABC last week he is more than willing to investigate the idea of getting farmers fighting fund money to pay for the lawyers and he rejects the suggestion that he has ever rebuffed any appeals for assistance.

Oh how the wind of change appear to a positive platform.

So the dedicated research, court papers collation, countless visits with bureaucracy departments and chambers of law to present the case from square one, DAVID -vs - GOLIATH ground breaking challenge of government dictatorship has them on the back foot.

Spencer has 4 cases/proceedings running now with every thing covered from Wild dogs to Park fencing and Nuisance. From rates on farm land we cannot farm because of native Veg laws to RLPB for the same reason from "Regulatory Takings" to State theft under "Just terms".......

He believes these issues must be fought - they should have been robustly fought over the last 30 years. He says, "BUT it is not too late and the farmers have some great people out there. By supporting them you will only strengthen your organisation and our Australian Democracy."

Peter Spencer will see swelling of support from not only the Farmers Association, but those well known fence sitters we see content to let the greens and government ride over the top of them, or believe politician promises will be honoured.

The Farmers Association's. Etc, rose to be counted a decade or so back and stormed Canberra. They raised millions of dollars from high profile attacks, (verbal of course) and the gunner factor was set in place- gunner do this, and gunner do that, and it all fizzled out. What happened to all that money?

Peter Spencer has archived mammoth inroads dissembling a government projected control of farmers Carbon Credits This only 1 case of the 4 being perused it alone is in the BILLIONS of dollars they intend to steal from land owners.

At today's rate if ordered now by the Court to be returned to its farmer owners, by 2050, the time Labour are saying they want to balance the carbon books, would amount to an income to farmers of 55 BILLION DOLLARS - the largest Just Terms theft in our History.

This effort, aided only by an under funded small dedicated group, plus the free services of senior legal people who can identify that Spencer is right, will create history.

Professor Wolfgang Kasper says the Native Vegetation Act is the biggest land grab in Australia's History and will cost the Nation Billions. ABC radio Counterpoint National January 2005

Over the weeks take note who join the parade of Spencer supporters, like the Jock Laurie's who taste a windfall to the rural communities because of this one man.

In my discussion with Peter Spencer today he said in summing up and by way of thanking his supporters and quoting from one of his recent media releases :

"In the meantime Mal, we the Farmers, the Primary Producers the Rural land owners the Rate payers the Landowners a-joining National Parks, we all stand up and applaud those lawyers and barristers supporting this challenge for looking beyond their pockets, beyond their self interest and seeing the vision splendid of that something recognised by all Australians, that which is worth fighting for, and in folklore we Aussies call it - getting a far go."

Editor


ABC's Tony Jones Team Against Martin Durkin's
"The Great Global Warming Swindle"


Our second chapter in the Tony Jones hosted Australian Broadcasting Corporation agenda driven attack upon the film "The Great Global Warming Swindle" and filmmaker Martin Durkin, was supposed to be the last, but after looking harder at this story we find that's just not possible to do justice to our right of reply.

We want to put to rest the vilification directed towards the people involved in the film as experts. A vilification clearly and intentionally driven by Tony Jones's zeal and his ABC minders.

Now Tony Jones, with the obvious zealous sanctioning of the ABC, used his miniscule wealth of biased scientific experience to ridicule two of Martin Durkin's experts and by so doing, hoped, as mentioned in our first article, that enough mud would stick to the other experts not mentioned, or discussed. To be fair, Tony Jones did ask a quick question in the debate after the film showing about the others, but it was so quickly glossed over that the "others" (seems like a line from "Lost") never received real honest, fair attention.

Well we are going to give you an overview of just who this film maker Martin Durkin used to compile his fair and just movie, but first we need to look at who the ABC and Tony Jones used in their self-driven and obsessed attempt to denigrate the film.

For CO2 Climate Change

Professor David Karoly----Lead Author of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)

Robyn Williams ----Science show presenter.

Nick Rowley ----Chief scientific climate change advisor to Tony Blair and also helped to set up the Stern report.
Nicki Williams-----CEO Minerals Council and Director of the Coal Association.
Greg Bourne----Former CEO of BP Australia and now the CEO of the WWF.

Middle of the Road

Mike Duffy----Well known Australian Journalist and Columnist.

Against CO2 Climate Change

Professor Bob Carter ----Geologist and scientist
Roy Evans ---- Lavoisier Group.

I will leave it up to the individual reader to consider the expertise and bias that each participant does, or does not bring to this debate and whether or not there is an agenda other than scientific analysis of Martin Durkin's film being delivered.

Given the above participants, you the reader are now invited to assess just who has the scientific credibility, Tony Jones and the ABC, or Martin Durkin and his team of experts and they are as follows:

Professor Tim Ball, Dept of Climatology, Winnepeg University.
Professor Nir Shviv, Astro Physicist.
Professor Ian Clark, Dept of Earth Sciences, Ottawa University.
Professor John Cristy, Dept of Atmospheric Science.
Professor Phillip Stott, Dept of Biogeography, London University.
Professor Paul Reiter, Dept of Medical Entomology, Pasteur Institute, Paris. Professor Richard Lindzen, Dept of Meteorology, Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
Professor Syun-Ichi Akasofu, Director of International Artic Research Centre.
Professor Carl Wunsch, Dept of Oceanography, Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
Professor Frederick Singer, Former Director of U.S. National weather Satellite Services.
Professor Eigil Friis-Christensen, Director of Danish National Space Centre.
Professor Patrick Michaels, Dept of Environmental Sciences, Virginia University.
Dr Roy Spencer, NASA Senior Scientist & Weather Satellite Team Leader.
Dr Piers Corbyn, Weather Forecaster.
Lord Lawson of Blaby, 1980 Chancellor of the Exchequer and former Secretary of State for Energy in the Thatcher Government.

Nigel Calder, Former Editor of "The New Scientist" and Co-Author of "Chilling Stars."

Patrick Moore, Co-Founder of Green Peace the International movement.

Paul Driessen, Former Environmentalist & Author of "Green Power, Black Death."

James Shikwati, Economist & Author, Africa.

Now we take you back to the Tony Jones attack on two of Durkin's experts and his desire to try and get mud to stick to all Martin's experts and we at SOS-NEWS can only come to the conclusion that Tony and his agenda driven team of "Kill the Durkin challenge to CO2 myth-science driven money manipulation", is a travesty in journalism and clearly is miss-appropriation of the tax payer's money to fund such a one sided abomination of investigative, professional journalism.

We will bring you the final chapter in this sorry saga soon, but you the reader's understanding of the depth of the scientific expertise Martin Durkin drew upon is very necessary for you to understand just how under-handed Tony Jones and the ABC were in their agenda driven delivery to homes across this Nation Australia.

Brumbby (with2 Y's)
brumbyy@sosnews.org

DROPPINGS FROM THE TOILET RODENT
It is difficult for Rodent to keep from smiling while the gall of Turnbull is discussed behind the door of a locked cubicle.

But it would seem that John Howard has got the right man for the job this time.

Who but Malcolm Turnbull (pictured below), on the government front bench, and (this one is hard to stop smiling at), Minister for the Environment, has more experience with ripping out timber from foreign shores.

The Solomon Islands, some years back, handed over their forests to Turnbull and the company he was flying with at the time, and in just 12 months he had commanded a team of methodical mechanised tree munchers that netted him personally over $20 million dollars - yes in just 12 months.

Now according to Rodent, this was achieved from conventional methods, but now it would seem that "Mal The Axeman" has new multimillion taxpayer funded technology on his side as he moved from perpetrator (or is that, perpe-traitor), to inquisitor for the environment and the party, using satellite monitoring systems to combat illegal logging.

Rodent is wondering if dealing with corrupt island officials and illiterates may be construed as "illegal logging"..hhhhmmmm?

Holding his hand at this taxpayer funded meeting today in Sydney, at the Hilton, will be Alexander Downer, where today brings together officials from the US, China, Brazil, Indonesian, Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands (must be friends of Malcolm's).

Whispers went further that the $200 million in funding, which would grab Malcolm's attention, has been allocated to the scheme to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by tackling deforestation around the world and remove our farmers from the equation. Scarpering to a second toilet cubicle, Rodent heard that the greens are not happy with the conference, and a stronger hand was needed to be taken.

Rodent was going to suggest Downer, with only Malcolm holding one of his hands, put Bob Brown on the other joining the comfort zone, but the thought of them skipping into the Hilton was just over the top


SUBMIT YOUR LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Let us know your thoughts and stories. Just type then click submit

Podcasting with SOS-NEWS

To have our weekly radio show - news publications - interviews, all the latest info detailed Pocast to you direct, just click the RSS button. If you do not have a reader we suggest Feed-Reader that is a free download and will keep you up to date with SOS-NEWS Podcasting. Visit our podcast page on the website and listen to SOS-NEWS Broadcasts with some great interviews all "off the cuff" no scripting or as the pollies require - "what questions will be asked" - it we the people speaking - - Click Here ....

Letters To The Editor

Hi Mal

The Bracks Government under the guise of the Victorian Environmental Assessment Council is seeking to snatch in excess of a 100,000 hectares of the publics land.

Highlights of this land snatch are, no collecting of firewood, limits on where you can camp, no hunting, forcing people to close their businesses.

There is no grazing, but they are allowing Aboriginals to claim firearms as a part of their cultural and heritage.

Its amusing that VEAC/Victorian Government wishes to have more land allocated when National Parks have proven they cannot manage land they already have.

VEAC also contends that no wood collection will stop forest fires.

Should people wish to express their concern over this new land snatch

Contact VEAC on 03 96379902 or 1800134803

Regards
Brian






WITHOUT PREJUDICE - UCC 1-207/1-308 I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, willingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And, furthermore, I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any un-revealed contract or commercial agreement. Signed by: Web author, Mal Davies agentŠ

             SOS-NEWS Sponsors click here to view

Editor: Mal Davies
editor@sosnews.org

Website: www.sosnews.org

Subscribe Free -
Click Here


UN-Subscribe -
Click Here

SOS-NEWS ..."The Voice OF Concerned Australians" ... Your UNCONTROLLED by government or corporate media service

Visit Our Recommended Links Here Have you a story to tell us? Click Here